• Facebook
  • Twitter
x

Edinburgh Elite media

  • Portfolio
  • About
  • Archive
  • Contact
Show Navigation
Cart Lightbox Client Area

Search Results

Refine Search
Match all words
Match any word
Prints
Personal Use
Royalty-Free
Rights-Managed
(leave unchecked to
search all images)
Next
{ 105 images found }
twitterlinkedinfacebook

Loading ()...

  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry MP after winning her appeal.<br />
<br />
Court of Session, today upheld an appeal from a cross party group of politicians seeking to declare the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Joanna_Cherry_wins_appeal_that_G...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry MP after winning her appeal.<br />
<br />
Court of Session, today upheld an appeal from a cross party group of politicians seeking to declare the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Joanna_Cherry_wins_appeal_that_G...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry MP after winning her appeal.<br />
<br />
Court of Session, today upheld an appeal from a cross party group of politicians seeking to declare the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Joanna_Cherry_wins_appeal_that_G...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry MP after winning her appeal.<br />
<br />
Court of Session, today upheld an appeal from a cross party group of politicians seeking to declare the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Joanna_Cherry_wins_appeal_that_G...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Alex Salmond outside the Court of Session following his victory.<br />
<br />
Former First Minister Alex Salmond is taking legal action against the Scottish Government over it's handling of sexual harassment allegations against the former MP and MSP. He is seeking a substantive judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, however the Scottish Government has conceded there were errors in the way the allegations were investigated, and is not contesting Mr Salmond's case.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Alex_Salmond_court_case_victory_...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry and Tommy Shepherd with supporters outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Supporters celebrate outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry speaks to the media  outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry speaks to the media  outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry speaks to the media  outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry speaks to the media  outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry and Tommy Shepherd with supporters outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Joanna Cherry and Tommy Shepherd with supporters outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: MP's Joanna Cherry speaks to the media after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Supporters celebrate outside the Court after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: MP's Joanna Cherry and Tommy Shepherd celebrate after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: MP's Joanna Cherry speaks to the media after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: MP's Joanna Cherry speaks to the media after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: MP's Joanna Cherry speaks to the media after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: MP's Joanna Cherry speaks to the media after the ruling.<br />
<br />
A cross-party group of over 70 politicians today won their appeal before the Court of Session seeking to rule that the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully in proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Scottish_Court_rules_parliament_...JPG
  • Pictured: Lawyer for the campaigners Elaine Motion speaks to the media after the Court decision.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Lawyer for the campaigners Elaine Motion speaks to the media after the Court decision.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Lawyer for the campaigners Elaine Motion speaks to the media after the Court decision.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Lawyer for the campaigners Elaine Motion speaks to the media after the Court decision.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Lawyer for the campaigners Elaine Motion speaks to the media after the Court decision.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters gathered to hear the Court postpone judgement until 21st October.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: Lawyer for the campaigners Elaine Motion speaks to the media after the Court decision.<br />
<br />
Judges at the Court of Session today deferred a decision on a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date, and to rule that the Court itself can seek an extension.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Jo Maugham QC from the Good Law Project who were one of the parties who brought the case, speaks to the media outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: SNP Joanna Cherry, one of the politicians who brought the court action, speaks to the media after the judgement.<br />
<br />
Lord Doherty, sitting in the Court of Session, today dismissed a cross party group of politicians bid for an interim interdict preventing the UK government and Prime Minister Boris Johnson from proroguing parliament.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_parliamentary_p...JPG
  • Pictured: Campaigner Jo Maugham QC speaks to the media outside the Court.<br />
<br />
The Court of Session today started hearing a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to get the Court to appoint someone to request a Brexit extension in the eve that the Prime Minister fails to seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_Brexit_extensio...JPG
  • Pictured: Protesters outside Court after the decision.<br />
<br />
Lord Peatland, sitting in the Court of Session, today rejected a bid by campaigners including SNP MP Joanna Cherry and others to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by the so called 'Benn Bill' and seek an extension to the October 31st Brexit date.<br />
<br />
© Dave Johnston / EEm
    EEm_Court_of_Session_rules_on_bid_to...JPG
Next